266 Conn. 925
Decided November 4, 2003
Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 2003-11-04
Relies on Ankerman v. Mancuso
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2003-11-04
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2020
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 79 Conn. App. 480 (AC 23369), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly refused to enforce a secondary mortgage loan transaction made by an attorney with a client despite its finding that the transaction violated the public policy underlying rule 1.8 (j) of the Rules of Professional Conduct?”