Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 266 F.2d 745 - Lassoff v. Gray

Lassoff v. Gray’s Empirical Analysis

266 F.2d 745 · 1959

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
October 2006
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently October 2006 · most notably Pizzarello v. United States (1969), United States v. Coson (1961)

23 federal appellate · 2 district ·

180195919601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. · Hill v. Wallace · Shelton v. Gill · John M. Hirst & Co. v. Gentsch · Midwest Haulers, Inc. v. Brady

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Here we' have three cases in which the parties will be denied a remedy unless and except they be afforded a hearing upon their complaints for injunction. It is true that if upon such hearing the alleged illegality and special and extraordinary circumstances do not in fact both exist then the restraint imposed by Section 7421(a) Internal Revenue Code of 1954 would apply, and the complaints would be dismissed, but we do not think that they should be dismissed without a hearing.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.