Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 266 F.2d 935 - Heerman v. Burke

Heerman v. Burke’s Empirical Analysis

266 F.2d 935 · 1959

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 2010 · most notably United States v. Ronald Leaching, United States of America v. Jerome Tremont (1970), Curtis Lumber Co. v. Louisiana Pacific Corp. (2010)

22 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2001959196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Securities & Exchange Commission · Herzog v. United States · Bloch v. United States · Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Green · Herzog v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`is entitled to a specific instruction on his theory of the case if there is evidence to support it, and if a proper request for the instruction has been made.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.