Parrott v. Corley’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
3 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1927
Relies on Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper · Jones v. Continental Corp. · Ridder v. City of Springfield · Rathbun v. Warren City Schools · Holmes v. City of Massillon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any attorney or other person admitted to conduct cases in any court of the United States or any Territory thereof who so multiplies the proceedings in any case unreasonably or vexatiously may be required by the court to satisfy personally the excess costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees reasonably incurred because of such conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.