Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 266 FAPPX 586 - Mirch v. Frank

Mirch v. Frank’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
March 2009
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Ed. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., a Corporation, Richard A. Perkins, Counsel for Ed Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., a Corporation, H. O'Neil Shanks, and Norman Stevans, Richard A. Perkins, Counsel For · Brown v. Baden · Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles · Bkb v. Maui Police Department

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.