Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 266 FSUPP 415 - Walker v. Weaver

Walker v. Weaver’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
September 1977
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 1391

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the first place, all of the named defendants are residents in the Western District of Pennsylvania. 28 U. S.C. § 1391(b) provides: “ ‘A civil action wherein jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship may be brought only in the judicial district where all defendants reside, except as otherwise provided by law.’ “Since 28 U.S.C. § 1343 , the statute providing for jurisdiction of cases under the Civil Rights .Act, has no special venue provision, 28 U.S.C. § 1391 (b) applies to this case. 1 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 0.144(17), p. 1680 (1964 ed.). This action does not rest on diversity of citizenship and under 28 U.S.C. § 1391 (b), the plaintiff has no choice of venue, but must bring the action in the district where the defendants reside. 1 Moore’s Federal Practice f[ 0.142(4), p. 1479 (1964 ed.). Since all the defendants reside in the Western District of Pennsylvania, that is where the plaintiff must bring the action.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.