United States v. Luisa’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1511 · 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1955 · 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2315 · 18 U.S.C. § 2342 · 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (Bail Reform Act of 1984)
Relies on Robinson v. Shell Oil Co. · Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co. · United States v. Hyde · United States v. DiSomma · United States v. Rueben
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a unique combination of circumstances giving rise to situations that are out of the ordinary.” DiSomma, 951 F.2d at 497 . An”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.