trueEX, LLC v. MarkitSERV Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 2 (§ 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 26 (§ 16 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914)
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United States v. Grinnell Corp. · eBay Inc. v. MERCEXCHANGE, LL · United States v. Colgate & Co. · Aspen Skiing Company v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a transaction between two counterparties in which one stream of future interest payments [on a notional debt obligation] is exchanged for another such stream on the same notional amount”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“findings are provisional in the sense that they are not binding on a motion for summary judgment or at trial and are subject to change as the litigation progresses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.