Royal v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2005
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Isaacs v. State · Brooks v. State · Dixon v. State · Gardiner v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order for a defendant to secure a new trial in the situation in which defense counsel lacked an item of information which objectively counsel should have obtained from a juror on voir dire, the defendant must show that the juror on voir dire failed to honestly answer a material question and that a correct response would have been a valid basis for challenge for cause. Isaacs v. State, 259 Ga. 717, 740 (44) (e) ( 386 SE2d 316 ) (1989). Accord Stiles v. State, 264 Ga. 446, 448 (3) ( 448 SE2d 172 ) (1994); Gardiner v. State, 264 Ga. 329, 333 (3) ( 444 SE2d 300 ) (1994); Poole v. State, 262 Ga. 668, 669 (2) ( 424 SE2d 275 ) (1993). See also Gainesville Radiology Group v. Hummel, 263 Ga. 91 ( 428 SE2d 786 ) (1993).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.