Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 266 GAAPP 405 - Evans v. State

Evans v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Allen v. State · Strozier v. State · Ford v. State · 225 Ga. App. 900 - Littleton v. State · 262 Ga. App. 304 - Ingram v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[13] T.E. testified that Evans forced her to have sex with him, that she did not want to engage in such conduct, and that his penis penetrated her vagina during sex. She also testified that Evans threatened to kill her and her family if she left his home. Such evidence authorized the jury's verdict as to rape. [14] 2. Before trial, Evans moved to sever the rape and false imprisonment charges relating to T.E. from the other counts involving T.F. and her sisters. The trial court denied the motion, and Evans enumerates this ruling as error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “chasing Keesha through the trailer park, thus providing corroboration for Keesha's description of events. Keesha's similar testimony regarding the chase and Evans' demeanor corroborated Kenya's description. In light of this evidence, the jury was authorized to find Evans guilty on both counts of terroristic threats. [11] (c) Rape. A person commits rape by having carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will. [12] Carnal knowledge is defined as”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “while living in Evans' house. Given these other references to drug use by Evans and others, as well as the court's curative instructions regarding the unresponsive answer at issue, we find no reasonable probability that counsel's failure to renew the motion for mistrial prejudiced Evans' defense. In short, Evans has not shown that T.F.'s reference to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.