Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 266 Ga. App. 502 - Bennett v. State

266 Ga. App. 502 - Bennett v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Bruton v. United States · Richardson v. Marsh · Hanifa v. State · Moss v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a defendant’s constitutional right of confrontation is violated when: (a) co-defendants are tried jointly; (b) one co-defendant’s statement is used to implicate the other co-defendant in the crime; and (c) the co-defendant who made the implicating statement employs his Fifth Amendment right not to testify and thus does not take the stand to face cross-examination about the statement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.