Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 266 Ga. App. 818 - Taylor v. State

266 Ga. App. 818 - Taylor v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 262 Ga. App. 806 - Mitchell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The standard of review for sufficiency of the evidence [in a criminal case] is set out in Jackson v. Virginia. 1 The relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. In addition, appellant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence. An appellate court determines only the legal sufficiency of the evidence adduced below and does not weigh the evidence or assess the credibility of the witnesses.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.