Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 266 Ga. App. 82 - Perez v. State

266 Ga. App. 82 - Perez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Laster v. State · Tubbs v. State · Smith v. State · 230 Ga. App. 326 - Cooke v. State · Pleas v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A manifest necessity exists when the defendant’s right to have the trial completed must be subordinated to the public interest in affording the prosecutor a fair opportunity to present evidence to an impartial jury, and the ends of substantial justice cannot be attained without discontinuing the trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Atrial judge has acted within his sound discretion in rejecting possible alternatives and in granting a mistrial, if reasonable judges could differ about the proper disposition, even though in a strict, literal sense, the mistrial is not necessary. This great deference means that the availability of another alternative does not without more render a mistrial order an abuse of sound discretion. Deference to the judge’s sound discretion also precludes a reviewing court from assuming, in the absence of record evidence, that the trial judge deprived a defendant of constitutional rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.