Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 266 Ind. 380 - Fair v. State

Fair v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
1
states following
September 2001
most recently cited

57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently September 2001 · most notably Murphy v. State (1977), Norton v. State (1980)

57 state decisions

3701977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chambers v. Maroney · Woodson v. North Carolina · Baum v. State · Luckett v. State · Turner v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is the rule that the presence of a stranger in the grand jury room during the investigation of a criminal charge is not sufficient to abate an indictment, unless it appears that the person indicted was thereby injured in his substantial rights.” 266 Ind. at 390 , 364 N.E.2d at 1012 quoting State v. Bates, (1897) 148 Ind. 610 , 48 N.E. 2 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.