Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 266 Ind. 640 - Faust v. State

Faust v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
June 1987
most recently cited

28 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Patterson v. State · Pirtle v. State · Swope v. State · McAfee v. State · Chatman v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, this Court does not weigh the evidence or review the credibility of the witnesses; we consider only the evidence most favorable to the verdict, together with the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom. The conviction will be affirmed, if there is substantial evidence of probative value from which the trier of fact could reasonably infer the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Daniels v. State, (1976), Ind., 346 N.E.2d 566 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.