State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

80 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““When the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged in a criminal case, the standard of review is whether, after review of all the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, the appellate court is convinced that a rational factfinder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Johnson, 266 Kan. 322 , Syl. ¶ 1, 970 P.2d 990 (1998).”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 27 Kan. App. 2d 754 - State v. Edwards · State v. Kunellis

2. ““To establish this charge, each of the following claims must be proved: “1. That the defendant intentionally took property, to-wit, a car, from the person of Timothy Jones; “2. That the taking was by threat of bodily harm to the person of Timothy Jones; “3. That the defendant was armed with a dangerous weapon, to-wit: a gun; and, “4. That this act occurred on or about the 31st day of January, 1998, in Wyandotte County, Kansas.” (Emphasis added.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 27 Kan. App. 2d 724 - State v. Robinson

3. “Permission to enter is legally significant only if given by the owner or occupant, or by a person with authority to do so.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Fenske v. State