Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 266 Ky. 346 - Read v. Carter

Read v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1939
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gibralter Coal Mining Co. v. Nalley · Edwards v. Johnson · Jewell v. Janes · Mannington Fuel Co. v. Ray's Administratrix · Gabbard v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is a fundamental principle of the law of negligence as between the master and servant that, in order for the servant to recover because of the master’s failure to furnish a reasonably safe place to work, the servant must allege and prove that the place where he was working and sustained his injury was unsafe, and that such fact was known to the employer, or by the exercise of ordinary care could have been known to him in time to have remedied the defects, and, except where the Workmen’s Compensation Act deprives the master of the defenses of contributory negligence and assumed risk, it is necessary for the servant to allege also that he did not know of the defects or unsafe condition.” [ 266 Ky. 346 , 98 S. W. (2d) 465 .]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.