Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 266 N.C. 189 - Hinkle v. Hinkle

Hinkle v. Hinkle’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
1
states following
December 2002
most recently cited

69 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently December 2002 · most notably Blackley v. Blackley (1974), 52 N.C. App. 203 - Falls v. Falls (1981)

69 state decisions

35019661970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fuchs v. Fuchs · Holden v. Holden · James v. Pretlow · Griffith v. Griffith · Kiger v. Kiger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The provisions of a valid separation agreement, including a consent judgment based thereon, cannot be ignored or set aside by the court without the consent of the parties. Such agreement, including consent judgments based on such agreements with respect to marital rights, however, are not final and binding as to the custody of minor children or os to the amount to be provided for the support and education of such minor children.” (Emphasis added.) Hinkle v. Hinkle, 266 N.C. 189, 195 , 146 S.E. 2d 73, 77 (1966).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.