State v. Ray’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently February 2025
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Oregon v. Elstad · United States v. Ceccolini
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is an unwarranted extension of Miranda to say that an unwarned statement `so taints the investigatory process that a subsequent voluntary and informed waiver is ineffective for some indeterminate period.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bormann“coercive police activity is a necessary predicate to the finding that a confession is not `voluntary' within the meaning of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bormann“`[The] circumstances surrounding the statement and the characteristics of the individual defendant at the time of the statement are potentially material considerations ....'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bormann
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.