State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1998
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Falstaff Brewing Corp. v. Lines · 137 N.J. Super. 306 - State v. Council · 128 N.J. Super. 488 - State v. Beatty · State v. Leibowitz · 43 N.J. Super. 386 - Lipschitz v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a defendant who is arrested on a new charge, committed while on parole, who was unable to raise bail and obtain his release, is entitled to an award of jail credit for the time served while awaiting disposition of the new charge, notwithstanding the fact that a detainer may have been lodged for a violation of parole. Until such time as his parole is actually violated his incarceration or confinement is attributable to the new offense, rather than the violation of parole, and he is therefore entitled to an award of credit. Once his parole is violated the credit will stop because his confinement is then attributable to the violation of parole and he is no longer entitled to an award of credit on any sentence that may thereafter be imposed for the new offense. [Id. at 158, 628 A.2d 837 (footnote omitted).]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harvey · State v. Black“R. 3:21-8 expresses the public policy of the State and should be liberally construed. Defendant was detained in a New York institution because of action taken by New Jersey, and whether that action finds its source in the robbery charge or the violation of parole charge is in our view immaterial. We accordingly hold that defendant is entitled to receive credit against his sentences for the 166 days that he was detained in the New York penal institution. [.Ibid.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Black“The State opposes this application contending that after the detainer was lodged by the Parole Board the defendant could not obtain his liberty. I disagree. A parolee charged with violation of parole need not be returned to custody, N.J.A.C. 10A:71-7.2. In fact, a parolee can be released even after probable cause has been found, N..J.A.C. 10A:71-7.9.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harvey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.