Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 266 PASUPER 18 - Commonwealth v. Alston

Commonwealth v. Alston’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 1983
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wade · Neil v. Biggers · Commonwealth v. Richman · Commonwealth v. Ravenell · Commonwealth v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The facts of the crimes charged are quite simple. On January. 14,1976, an intruder burst into the home of Edith Smith. The intruder, after forcing his way through the front door, and into the living room of the home pointed a pistol at Mrs. Smith, who was in that room. He unplugged and picked up a portable television set in the room and immediately left the home. This incident was viewed by another occupant of the home, Mrs. Katherine Gorman, who was a tenant of Mrs. Smith, and who was looking into the room when the intruder entered, grabbed the television, and then departed with the television.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]f there is any reasonable ground to conclude that the arguably tainted evidence in issue may have contributed to the conviction, it is not appropriate to find the error harmless. Commonwealth v. Laws, 474 Pa. 318 , 378 A.2d 812 (1977).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.