Hall v. King’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Shapiro v. Thompson · Dunn v. Blumstein · Georgia Southern & Florida Ry. Co. v. SEVEN-UP BOTT. CO. SE GEORGIA · Holland v. Florida Real Estate Commission Ex Rel. Linesbaugh · 170 So. 2d 33 - Mercer v. Hemmings
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Unless there is a reasonable, compelling, state interest justifying the residency requirement, it cannot be upheld for it clearly has a chilling effect on Florida real estate brokers who might wish to reside in another state. According to the Supreme Court of the United States in Shapiro v. Thompson, 1969, 394 U.S. 618, 629 , 89 S.Ct. 1322, 1329 , 22 L.Ed.2d 600 , ‘all citizens [must] be free to travel throughout the length and breadth of our land uninhibited by statutes, rules or regulations which unreasonably burden or restrict this movement.’ That right may be restricted only for a compelling state interest. Shapiro v. Thompson, supra; Dunn v. Blumstein, 1972, 405 U.S. 330 , 92 S.Ct. 995 , 31 L.Ed.2d 274 .” 266 So.2d at 34 . (Emphasis in original.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.