¶1The grounds relied upon by the appellant for reversal of her conviction of buying, receiving or aiding in the concealment of stolen property have been considered in the light of the record and briefs and we find no reversible error. We find that the judgment is supported by the evidence and that the several rulings of the trial court challenged by the appellant did not, under the law, constitute error. Therefore, the judgment and sentence appealed are affirmed.
¶2Affirmed.