Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 266 SW2D 252 - Mitchell v. Mitchell

Mitchell v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 1966
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Society for Friendless Children · Tims v. Tims · State v. Thurmond · Hudgens v. Yancey · Hawkins v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It has been the well settled law of this State since the decision by the Supreme Court of the case of State v. Thurmond, 37 Tex. 340 , that no jurisdiction is vested in the appellate courts directly to review a contempt proceeding. The only manner in which such a proceeding and judgment thereon can be reviewed is by means of habeas corpus. Hudgens v. Yancey, Tex.Civ.App., 284 S.W. 347 ; Borrer v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 63 S.W. 630 ; Lawley v. State, 117 Tex.Cr.R. 14 , 36 S.W.2d 1035 , and cases there cited.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.