State v. Stites’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Doyle v. Ohio · Wainwright v. Greenfield · State v. Roper · State v. Scurlock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610, 618 (1976), the United States Supreme Court held that the use for impeachment purposes of a defendant's silence, at the time of arrest and after receiving Miranda warnings, is fundamentally unfair and violates the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“determine whether there is, indeed, plain error, which is error that is 'evident, obvious, and clear.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.