Brams Trust 2 v. Haydon’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2013
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Claflin v. Claflin · Brock v. Blackwood · Jantz v. Brewer · Kinder v. Missouri Department of Corrections · Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. Ken Kauffman & Sons Excavating, L.L.C.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well settled, in interpreting a statute, that the legislature is presumed to have acted intentionally when it includes language in one section of a statute, but omits it from another. “A disparate inclusion or exclusion of particular language in another section of the same act is ‘powerful evidence’ of legislative intent.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Denbow v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.