¶1 ORDER
¶2 Appellant Arthur Smith appeals the trial court’s conviction on two counts of second-degree domestic assault (§ 565.073). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No prece-dential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting *334 forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).