Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 267 Ala. 435 - Bertolla v. Kaiser

Bertolla v. Kaiser’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
July 1984
most recently cited

51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1984 · most notably National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama M Flowers (1964), Roan v. Smith (1961)

51 state decisions

3601958196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad v. Crocker · King v. Jackson · Phœnix Insurance v. Moog · Sieben v. Torrey · Keene v. Meade

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Assignment of error 1 recites: “ T. The verdict and judgment are contrary to the law and the evidence.’ “Assignments 2 through 9 are to like effect. Such assignments are not sufficient to present any question for our review. King v. Jackson, 264 Ala. 339 , 87 So.2d 623 ; Supreme Court Rule 1, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The rule is well-established that ‘ * * * the acceptance or rejection of evidence not strictly in rebuttal is within the sound discretion of the trial court.’ Sieben v. Torrey, 252 Ala. 675, 677 , 42 So.2d 621, 623 , and authorities there cited.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.