Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 267 ARK 113 - Bushong v. State

Bushong v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
June 2002
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 2002

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

801979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Denno · Kahm v. United States · Degler v. State · 211 Ill. 2d 395 - People v. Santos · People v. Stark and Peacock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Tjhere must be some connection between the witness and the alleged acts of coercion or an opportunity to observe the alleged coercion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]henever the accused offers testimony that his confession was induced by violence, threats, coercion, or offers of reward then the burden is upon the state to produce all material witnesses who were connected with the controverted confession or give adequate explanation for their absence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.