Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 267 F.1d 1019 - In re Prentice

In re Prentice’s Empirical Analysis

267 F. 1019 · 1920

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
August 1934
most recently cited

3 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Crompton · In re Walsh Bros.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under Bankruptcy Act, § 67f [11 USCA § 107 (f)], dissolving an attachment levied within four months before bankruptcy, unless the court shall on due notice order it preserved for the benefit of the estate, the mere adjudication and appointment of a trustee do not preserve the attachment, but there must be affirmative action of the court to that effeet.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Unless the court shall, on due notice, order that right. * * * ”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.