Block v. Hirsh

Submitted November 15, 1920.

Decided November 15, 1920.)

District of Columbia District Court · decided 1920-11-15

Action between Julius Block, trading and carrying on business under the name and style of. Whites, and Louis Hirsh. Judgment for the latter, and the former appeals.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1931

1 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Relies on Hirsh v. Block

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1920-11-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from tbe Supreme Court of tbe District of Columbia.

¶2Action between Julius Block, trading and carrying on business under the name and style of. Whites, and Louis Hirsh. Judgment for the latter, and the former appeals.

¶3Affirmed.

¶4J. I. Peyser, J. C. Adkins, and Geo. E. Edelin, all of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

¶5Wm. G. Johnson, of Washington, D. C. (Myer Cohen and Richard D. Daniels, both of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellee.

¶6PER CURIAM.

¶7Eor the reasons stated in our opinion in the case of Block v. Hirsh (No. 3372) 50 App. D. C.-, 267 Fed. 614, the judgment in this case is affirmed, with costs.

¶8SMYT1I, Chief Justice.

¶9I dissent, for the reasons expressed in my opinion when this case was here before, and adopt that opinion as my opinion in this case.