Fido v. Brazileiro’s Empirical Analysis
267 F. 733 · 1919
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2002
2 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on George Crossman v. William Burrill · Empire Transp. Co. v. Philadelphia & R. Coal & Iron Co. · Olsen v. United States Shipping Co. · New Ruperra S. S. Co. v. 2,000 Tons of Coal · Quillan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is the law of this court that charterers are not liable for concealed defects in the cargo or subject to any implied warranty of its fitness for shipment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.