Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 267 F.2d 271 - Sutton v. United States

Sutton v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

267 F.2d 271 · 1959

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2023

19 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

9019591960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McNabb v. United States · Mallory v. United States · United States v. Mitchell · Upshaw v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is one thing to say that officers shall gain no advantage from violating the individual's rights; it is quite another to declare that such a violation shall put him beyond the law's reach even if his guilt can be proved by evidence that has been obtained lawfully.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.