Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 267 F.2d 352 - Groce v. Seder

Groce v. Seder’s Empirical Analysis

267 F.2d 352 · 1959

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
September 1995
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 1995

18 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

8019591960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Neff · Glover v. United States · Parker v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here both sides are represented by eminently competent counsel we think it important that the court minimize its own questioning of witnesses, to the end that any such judicial departure from the normal course of trial be merely helpful in clarifying the testimony rather than prejudicial in tending to impose upon the jury what the judge seems to think about the evidence.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.