Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 267 F.2d 741 - United States v. De Simone

United States v. De Simone’s Empirical Analysis

267 F.2d 741 · 1959

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently March 2011 · most notably United States v. Williams (1980), United States v. Leyva (1975)

27 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

1601959196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3691 · 18 U.S.C. § 401 · 18 U.S.C. § 402 · 28 U.S.C. § 1825 · 28 U.S.C. § 294

Relies on United States v. United Mine Workers of America · Stern v. Board of Levee Commissioners · In re Debs · Sacher v. United States · Green v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(b) Disposition upon Notice and Hearing. A criminal contempt except as provided in subdivision (a) of this rule shall be prosecuted on notice. The notice shall state the time and place of hearing, allowing a reasonable time for the preparation of the defense, and shall state the essential facts constituting the criminal contempt charged and describe it as such. The notice shall be given orally by the judge in open court in the presence of the defendant or, on application of the United States attorney or of an attorney appointed by the court for that purpose, by an order to show cause or an order of arrest. The defendant is entitled to a trial by jury in any case in which an act of Congress so provides. He is entitled to admission to bail as provided in these rules. If the contempt charged involves disrespect to or criticism of a judge, that judge is disqualified from presiding at the trial or hearing except with the defendant’s consent. Upon a verdict or finding of guilt the court shall enter an order fixing the punishment.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““A court of the United States shall have power to punish by fine or imprisonment, at its discretion, such contempt of its authority, and none other, as— •***«•** “(3) Disobedience or resistance to its lawful writ,' process, order, rule, decree, or command.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.