Slade v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
267 F.2d 834 · 1959
Citation profile
52 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently August 2011 · most notably United States v. Cisneros-Gutierrez (2008), Bell v. City of Milwaukee (1984)
52 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 5008
Relies on Allen v. United States · Bryan v. United States · Di Carlo v. United States · Ex Parte Allen · United States v. Allied Stevedoring Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“' Young v. United States, supra , 97 F.2d 200 , at page 207.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““ * * * This recor¿ demonstrates that we do not have here the situation of an ex parte statement, introduced as a prior inconsistent statement and then used in the examination of the recalcitrant or hostile witness, with the witness finally affirming the truthfulness and correctness of the statement, rather than the initial, oral Court testimony. When that takes place, the statement is effectually embraced by the witness, becomes a part of his-oath-supported court-given testimony subject to cross examination, and is therefore not hearsay. Feutralle v. United States, 5 Cir., 1954, 209 F.2d 159, 162 ; Harman v. United States, 4 Cir., 1952, 199 F.2d 34 ; cf. United States v. Allied Stevedor-ing Corp., 2 Cir., 1957, 241 F.2d 925, 932 , and Di Carlo v. United States, 2 Cir., 1925, 6 F.2d 364, 368 ; and see McCormick, Evidence § 39 (1954). *X- -X- »”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.