Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 267 F.2d 849 - In re Bear River Drainage District

In re Bear River Drainage District’s Empirical Analysis

267 F.2d 849 · 1959

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
3
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably University of South Alabama v. American Tobacco Co. (1999), Libhart v. Santa Monica Dairy Co. (1979)

21 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions

1101959196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Borden Co. · United States v. United States · United States v. Rice · Pacific Live Stock Co. v. Lewis · Rosenberg v. Denno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “), the Tenth Circuit reasoned that, 59 [w]hile the generality of § 1292(b) might seem sufficient to encompass a remand order, it does not expressly either amend or repeal § 1447(d). Repeals by implication are not favored. The intention of Congress to repeal, modify or supersede must be clear and manifest. The earlier statute, § 1447(d), applies specially to prohibit appeals from remand orders. The later statute, § 1292(b), applies generally to”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. McNally v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey · Ryan v. Dow Chemical Co.
  2. “an order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Rosenthal-Block China Corporation Loewy

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.