Gerling Global Reinsurance Corporation of America Gerling Global Reinsurance Corporation-US Branch Gerling Global Life Reinsurance Company v. Tom Gallagher’s Empirical Analysis
267 F.3d 1228 · 2001
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably American Bankers Insurance Group v. United States (2005), Kernel Records Oy v. Mosley (2012)
8 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hanson v. Denckla · United States v. Morton Salt Co. · Quill Corporation v. North Dakota Heitkamp · Allstate Insurance v. Hague · Fitzpatrick v. City of Atlanta
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of Am. v. Gallagher, 267 F.3d 1228 , 1233 (11th Cir.2001) (citing Hilburn v. Murata Elecs. N. Am., Inc., 181 F.3d 1220 , 1225 (11th Cir.1999)); see also Gray v. Manklow (In re Optical Techs., Inc.), 246 F.3d 1332 , 1334-35 (11th Cir.2001). Thus, summary judgment is appropriate where”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he Legislature's inclusion of the claims recovery provisions in the same statute itself belies any suggestion that the reporting provisions are really intended to protect ordinary policyholders by monitoring the exposure and financial sufficiency of Florida insurers.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.