Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

267 F. App'x 306

Lamb v. Astrue

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided March 3, 2008

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2008-03-03

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2008-03-03

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Robert Emerson Lamb appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction because he failed to exhaust the required administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. * Lamb v. Astrue, No. 4:07-cv-00021-RBS (E.D.Va. Oct. 5, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

*

¶3 To the extent we may properly consider Lamb's constitutional challenge to the statutory and regulatory provisions setting a limit on insured status for disability insurance claimants, we find the claim meritless.

/267/fappx/306 · .json · Public domain