¶1 The attorney appointed to represent Kendrick Lamond Thomas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Thomas has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Thomas’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Thomas’s motion to appeal pro se is DENIED.
267 F. App'x 325
United States v. Thomas
U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided February 20, 2008
U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2008-02-20
Relies on Anders v. California
Decided 2008-02-20