Cattle Owners Corp. v. Arkin’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
July 1991
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on Cramer v. Phœnix Mut. Life Ins. · Cattle Owners Corp. v. Arkin · Coburn v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company of Hartford Connecticut
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““23. Carvel Hall, Inc., Touraine TV Corporation, Peter TV Corporation, National W.T.I., Inc., Gold Coast TV, Inc., and Wells Quality Breeders, offered extensive evidence of their entitlement to the proceeds of certain animals in a hearing before this Court January 5, 1965, et seq., and such evidence was properly re-offered herein. Such evidence establishes entitlement of said companies in and to said funds as against each and every party to this action, including but without limitation, Nathan Sheinman, Arnold H. Arnold, Esther Reifer, Murray Collura, Harold Bearnot, Beatrice Shaw, by Nathan Sheinman, her trustee, Foremost Breeders, Inc., Martha Jacobson, and the Leo Jacobson Estate. 267 F.Supp. 665 . (Emphasis added)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The major premise that ‘all things must end’ has appropriate application in these proceedings.” 267 F.Supp. 658 at 659 (1967).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.