267 F. Supp. 2d 1059 - Jackson v. Austin’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1920 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Blum v. Stenson · Ramos v. Lamm · Metz v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. · Case v. Unified School District No Johnson County Kansas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“saves a significant amount of manual research time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.