Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 267 Ga. 116 - Anderson v. State

Anderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably 229 Ga. App. 450 - Buffington v. State (1997), 227 Ga. App. 46 - Holt v. State (1997)

28 state decisions

1101996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Waller v. Georgia · Dean v. State · Orkin v. State · Waller v. State · State v. Strickman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n a motion to suppress, `(t)he credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be accorded their testimony rest with the trier of fact, who is under no obligation to believe a witness, even in the absence of contradictory testimony. The factfinder may accept part of a witness' testimony and reject another part, and "(i)n the absence of evidence of record demanding a finding contrary to the judge's determination, (the appellate) court will not reverse the ruling sustaining a motion to suppress. (Cit.)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(i)n the absence of evidence of record demanding a finding contrary to the judge's determination, (the appellate) court will not reverse the ruling sustaining a motion to suppress. (Cit.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.