Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 267 Ga. 655 - Hamilton v. Cannon

Hamilton v. Cannon’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently November 2013 · most notably Stone v. North Carolina Department of Labor (1998), Hunt v. North Carolina Department of Labor (1998)

2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

150199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lau's Corp., Inc. v. Haskins · City of Rome v. Jordan · Department of Transportation v. Brown · Anderson v. Little & Davenport Funeral Home, Inc. · 212 Ga. App. 700 - Landis v. Rockdale County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) an assumption by the municipality, through promises or actions, of an affirmative duty to act on behalf of the party who was injured; (2) knowledge on the part of the municipality's agent that inaction could lead to harm; (3) some form of direct contact between the municipality's agents and the injured party; and (4) that party's justifiable reliance on the municipality's affirmative undertaking....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “was directed squarely and only at the duty owed by a governmental entity to provide police protection to individual citizens.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.