Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 267 Ga. 754 - Lowe v. State

Lowe v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2014

16 state decisions

80199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dobbins v. State · 223 Ga. App. 139 - Botts v. Givens · Reed v. State · Vargas v. Morris · 119 Ga. App. 144 - Brackett v. HR BLOCK & COMPANY

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a claimant wishing to assert an equal protection claim . . . `must establish that he (sic) is similarly situated to members of the class who are treated differently from him' (sic). . . . If that point cannot be established, there is no need to continue with an equal protection analysis,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"While a writ of mandamus will issue to compel a due performance of specific official duties, it will not lie to compel a general course of conduct or the performance of continuous duties nor will it lie where the court issuing the writ would have to undertake to oversee and control the general course of official conduct of the party to whom the writ is directed." [Cit.] The issuance of the writ of mandamus in this case would mandate a course of conduct by [Dean]. [Cit.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.