Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 267 Ga. App. 612 - Standfill v. State

267 Ga. App. 612 - Standfill v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
January 2009
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Neil v. Biggers · Williams v. State · Clark v. State · 209 Ga. App. 53 - Jackson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Testimony concerning a pre-trial identification of a defendant is inadmissible if the identification procedure was impermissibly suggestive and, under the totality of the circumstances, the suggestiveness gave rise to a substantial likelihood of misidentification. . . . An identification procedure is deemed impermissibly suggestive when it is the equivalent of the authorities telling the witness “This is our suspect.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “There is a two-step test to determine admissibility: (1) whether there was an impermissibly suggestive photographic identification procedure, and (2) if so, whether under the totality of the circumstances this resulted in a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification. 4”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.