Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 267 Ill. App. 3d 253 - Johnson v. Johnson

267 Ill. App. 3d 253 - Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
June 2002
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Titus v. Wallick · Dow v. Blake · 262 Ill. App. 3d 61 - Fullco Lumber Co. v. Donat · Doerr v. Schmitt · 253 Ill. App. 3d 923 - In Re Marriage of Kramer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A copy of any foreign judgment authenticated in accordance with the acts of Congress or the statutes of this State may be filed in the office of the circuit clerk for any county of this State. The clerk shall treat the foreign judgment in the same manner as a judgment of the circuit court for any county of this State. A judgment so filed has the same effect and is subject to the same procedures, defenses and proceedings for reopening, vacating, or staying as a judgment of a circuit court for any county of this State and may be enforced or satisfied in like manner.” 735 ILCS 5/12—652 (West 1994).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““[T]here is a question regarding when that limitations period begins to run: from the date of rendition of the judgment or from the date it is registered. We need not answer this question because petitioner has yet to seek enforcement of the Florida judgment, and respondent’s appeal is limited to the issue of whether the judgment was properly registered.” (Emphasis added.) Johnson, 267 Ill. App. 3d at 255 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.