People v. Pence’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 155 Ill. 2d 188 - People v. Bole · 108 Ill. 2d 70 - People v. Perez · 149 Ill. 2d 118 - People v. Johnson · 157 Ill. 2d 68 - People v. Robinson · 99 Ill. 2d 262 - People v. Sanders
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Although there was evidence from which the jury could have concluded that two of the offenses were part of a single course of conduct, the language of the charging document, the evidence at trial, and the general verdict of the jury do not permit the 'single course of conduct’ conclusion required by Bole for mandatory consecutive sentencing.” (Emphasis omitted.) Pence, 267 Ill. App. 3d at 466 . Here, as in Pence, the State never established how defendant’s three convictions related to any given”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.