Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 267 Ind. 177 - Epps v. State

Epps v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
3
states following
August 2008
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently August 2008 · most notably Secon Service System, Inc. v. St. Joseph Bank & Trust Co. (1988), 401 So. 2d 1328 - Mansur v. Eubanks (1981)

2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

2701977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Maldonado v. State · Gaddis v. State · Johnson v. State · 157 Ind. App. 59 - Guyton v. State · Hanrahan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Upon the filing of a properly verified application, a change of venue from the county shall be granted in all cases punishable by death and may be granted in all other cases when in the court’s discretion cause for such change is shown to exist after such hearing or upon such other proof as the court may require. “An application for a change of judge or change of venue from the county shall be filed within ten [10] days after a plea of not guilty, .... “Provided, however, that if the applicant first obtains knowledge of the cause for change of venue from the judge or from the county after the time above limited, he may file the application, which shall be verified by the party himself specifically alleging when the cause, was first discovered, how it was discovered, the facts showing the cause for a change, and why such cause could not have been discovered before by the exercise of due diligence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.