Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 267 Ind. 27 - Moon v. State

Moon v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently October 2017

22 state decisions

10019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bartone v. United States · Kleinrichert v. State · Coleman v. State · Young v. State · Franks v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Conviction of a non-existent crime is fundamental error, Young v. State (1967) 249 Ind. 286 , 281 N.B.2d 797, which error, if apparent on the face of the record, cannot be ignored by the reviewing court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"If kidnapping is not encompassed within the armed felony statute ... then no such offense of 'armed kidnapping' exists. That being so the conviction for 'armed kidnapping' is a nullity. Convic tion of a non-existent crime is fundamental error ... which is apparent on the face of the record and cannot be ignored by the reviewing court... We have no choice but to vacate appellant's conviction. In doing so we are not unmindful that appellant does not desire this relief, but correction of fundamental error is not intended for the advantage of the accused."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.